Tweets by @my66
!function(d,s,id){var js,fjs=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],p=/^http:/.test(d.location)?’http’:’https’;if(!d.getElementById(id)){js=d.createElement(s);js.id=id;js.src=p+”://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js”;fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js,fjs);}}(document,”script”,”twitter-wjs”);
 <a class=”twitter-timeline” href=”https://twitter#com/my66″ data-widget-id=”484869528589836289″>Tweets by @my66</a> <script>!function#d,s,id#{var js,fjs=d#getElementsByTagName#s#[0],p=/^http:/#test#d#lo#ation#?’http’:’https’;if#!d#getElementById#id##{js=d#createElement#s#;js#id=id;js#src=p+”://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js”;fjs.parentNode.insertBefore#js,fjs#;}}#document,”script”,”twitter-wjs”#;</script>.
to continue in the “conversation.”
Click me to “Start the conversation…” ;)v
Click me to “Start the conversation…” 😉
Jehmu Greene‘s rhetoric is just one bombastic — large AND loud — example of a sissified & callous approach to argument, often referred to as “passive-aggression.” While constantly preaching about the “need” for a “conversation,” she knowingly partakes in a awkward-seeming but all too coherent attack, one which I simplified in an article titled, “HIDDEN EVIL.” This is a planned strategy, the primary purpose of which is to all but force the opponent to utter something — ANYTHING! — that might render said opponent  illiberal, racist or otherwise disqualified to continue in the “conversation.”